Paper at Inter-Regional Society of Jungian Analysts Meeting April 13-18, 2011

I will be presenting a paper entitled "Is There Room for Ruthlessness in Analysis?" at the spring meeting of the Inter-Regional Society of Jungian Analysts in Boulder, CO on April 14th. 


The paper is a meditation on the experience of ruthlessness in analysis.  Much has been written on the analyst’s experience of the ruthlessness that emerges from the patient’s psyche but little about ruthlessness as a quality possessed by the analyst or reflected in the analyst’s activity. 


Often it seems it is the passive-receptive-holding-maternal-containing-unknowing attitudes and activities which are valued and emphasized in our training, literature, and clinical dialogues.  In today’s analytic world, might there not be a need for a reclaiming of the active-penetrating-paternal-phallic-disruptive-discriminating aspects of analysis? While most experienced analysts will endorse the importance of allowing the negative transference reaction to become embodied in an analysis, I wonder if we offer our analytic candidates sufficent guidance about how that might be engaged and survived.  Has the Weltanschauung of Analytical Psychology, in regards to the analyst’s activity, become one-sided?  Has a tension of opposites been lost in terms of our analytic stance, perhaps like the tension was lost when Freud and Jung parted ways nearly 100 years ago?  It seems that ruthlessness, when it is acknowledged as an analytic quality, at best, is treated as an unwelcome dinner guest – sometimes tolerated but not valued or respected.  My experiences have led me to the conclusion that a capacity for ruthlessness should occupy a space in our analytic sensibilities much like the capacity for patience, curiosity, awe, complexity, empathy, and openness to psychic reality.    


The idea of analytic ruthlessness is examined via Jung's concept of the tension of opposites and a re-consideration of the concept of analytic authority.  My paper will outline a theoretical, clinical, and archetypal rationale for embracing ruthlessness as a necessary and essential analytic quality, without which certain aspects of analytic experience would be left untouched and therefore unavailable for transformation. 

Views: 66


You need to be a member of Depth Psychology Alliance to add comments!

Join Depth Psychology Alliance

Comment by Dennis Pottenger on April 5, 2011 at 8:35pm

I'll look for your paper, Mark. 

Comment by Mark Winborn on April 5, 2011 at 6:10pm

Thanks for your comments Dennis.  The paper should be up on the IRSJA website relatively soon after the meeting concludes.  Following some revisions, I'll also submit it to the Journal of Analytical Psychology for publication. IRSJA Articles Page

Comment by Dennis Pottenger on April 4, 2011 at 7:28pm
I would like to read your paper, Mark, as well as share your ideas with several depth-oriented colleagues, all of whom have trained at Pacifica Graduate Institute.  As an MFT Intern who plans to train later as a Jungian analyst I've experienced the ruthlessness you describe several times.  These experiences have been both beautiful and terrifying -- for me a clear sign that the numinosum is present.  As I say, I look forward to exposing myself to your experiences and insights around ruthlessness "as a necessary and essential analysitc quality."  Will your paper be published following the Inter-Regional Society spring meeting?  Best, Dennis Pottenger     

A hub for "all things Depth Psychology," with over 5000 members, Depth Psychology Alliance is FREE to join. Simply sign UP or sign IN to comment or post.

Click the logos for more information!






Subscribe to the "Latest Activity" RSS 

feed for Depth Psychology Alliance


© 2020   Created by James Newell.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service