Barry’s Blog # 103: Hands up, Don’t Shoot: The Sacrifice of American Dionysus — Part Five of Five

But What About Ferguson? Returning to this question of “every 28 hours,” we ask incredulously, innocently, again: How often do police shoot unarmed black people? Is it surprising that the government keeps no statistics ( Recently, some citizen groups have been trying to find out: It turns out that the number of persons killed by police in the past decade has exceeded the number of troops killed in the Iraq War ( In St. Louis alone, police had already shot 16 people in 2014, most of them black, before the Michael Brown killing.

But isn’t it about criminal behavior, not race? Not when we have multiple examples of white men pointing loaded guns at police (including the Cliven Bundy standoff) and not be shot? Tim Wise offers this example:

When a white man in…New Orleans can literally point his weapon directly at…members of the New Orleans Police Department, and when told to drop his weapon, answer back, “No, you drop your fucking gun,” and remain a breathing, carbon-based life form — as was the case this past April for Derrick Daniel Thomas — then you know you’re dealing with a two-tiered law enforcement regime hardly different from the ones that existed under Jim Crow. Google the NOPD and check out their history if you harbor any doubts about how such an act as Thomas’s would have gone down had he been black (

It is most certainly about race. Blacks suffer over five times as many non-fatal injuries per capita from the police as white people do. African American youth are six times more likelythan white youth to be incarcerated for a first offense, even when their crimes are identical. Blacks are 4 times more likely than whites to be arrested for a marijuana possession offense, even though rates of usage are virtually identical across racial lines. Police in towns like Ferguson are almost twice as likely to stop and search black motorists as opposed to white ones, even though whites are nearly 60 % more likely to have illegal contraband on them when searched.

Wise concludes:

Fifty years later and white law enforcement officers are still behaving as if the ruling in Dred Scott (1857) — that blacks “have no rights which the white man is bound to respect” — were still operative…When a white man can shoot a police officer and kill him because he thought the officer (who was executing a no-knock drug raid on his home) might be a burglar, andnot face charges, but a black man who does the very same thing in the very same state is charged with multiple felonies, what do we call it if not a sign of apartheid justice in America?

But do cops really get away with such discriminatory – and frequently murderous – behavior? Take my liberal, minority-led city of Oakland, where the NAACP reports ( that out of 45 officer-involved shootings in the city between 2004 and 2008, 37 of those shot were black. None were white. One-third of the shootings resulted in fatalities. Although weapons were not found in 40 percent of cases, no officers were charged. (These numbers don’t include the Oscar Grant case).

Nationwide, in 2012, law enforcement ruled a total of 410 such deaths as “justified homicides.” The annual number has been steady for much of the past two decades (

It is not 1965 anymore. Perhaps in large swaths of the nation, at least among white, religious people older than age 50 – those most susceptible to the non-stop fear-mongering – it is no longer possible to be shamed into living up to America’s ideals. After 1970, and continuing since that time, conservatives have taken advantage of the old narratives of “othering.” They have once again convinced large segments of the population to identify as “white” rather than as workers who have common cause with people of color. A half century of shock-jocks, Fox News, Rambo superheroes, economic depression, Democratic collusion, racist televangelists and media caricatures of dark-skinned criminals have given them permission to flaunt their worst impulses, to stand proudly in their refusal to welcome the Other into the City of the Elect.

Even as I write this essay yet another video surfaces of six NYPD officers beating an unarmed Latino man:

Can we speak of “guilty pleasures?” Perhaps, as they did in 1890 when they flocked to dozens of public lynchings, they – we – now enjoy watching the videos of cops shooting and beating unarmed men of color.

What do Americans think of all this? While 80% of African Americans say the murder of Michael Brown “raises important issues about race that merit discussion,” only 37% of whites agree. Instead, 47% of whites said that “race is getting more attention than it deserves” in the Ferguson case (

This discrepancy returns us to the question of white privilege. Half of all whites believe that blacks enjoy economic parity with them, 61% say the average black has equal or better access to health care than the average white, and 85% say that blacks have just as good a chance as whites do to get any housing they can afford – and all this despite the contrary views held by the vast majority of black people. This means that whites are privileged to say to blacks, in effect, “I know your reality better than you do.” It means that they have the privilege to determine who the Other is, and in the process, to know who they are.

The militarization of the police is clearly related to both the bogus war on drugs (in reality a war against poor people and people of color) and the highly contrived war on terror. In 1980 tactical police units (SWAT teams) were deployed some 3,000 times across America. Now they occur 50,000 times per year, or 150 times per day. Such units are not just common in big cities: though nearly 90% of American cities with populations above 50,000 have them, so do more than 90% of police departments in small-to-medium size cities. It bears repeating that his huge rise in paramilitary police forces has occurred as violent crime levels have fallen. And most SWAT teams are deployed to serve routine drug-related warrants on private homes, often with disastrous consequences, using military equipment originally intended to be used in full-scale warfare.

And the militarization of the police is more than the result of mass paranoia; it is also related to good old American ingenuity and pork-barrel corruption. The National Database of Critical Terrorist Targets, established after 9/11, has grown to over 300,000 localities, and Indiana has grabbed more (over 9,000!) than California and New York combined. The department’s database of “vulnerable critical infrastructure and key resources” includes amusement parks, ice cream parlors, a petting zoo, a popcorn factory, a bourbon festival and a kangaroo conservation center. You get the idea. Curiously, the list does not include New York City’s Times Square.

Que bono: follow the money.

Then consider how a small town with a police force of 25 officers received six free military Humvees from the federal government (, or why the feds have dispersed twelve thousand bayonettes to local cops. And the equipment must be usedwithin a year, or cities are required to return it.

It comes from the Pentagon’s 1033 program, which has provided $5.1 billion in surplus military equipment to local police since 1997, as well as grant programs run by the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security. The grants have enabled local law enforcement to purchase $34 billion in weaponry since 9/11/2001. The governments gives them the money, and they buy the stuff from arms merchants. At least if they buy it, they don’t have to use it within a year…

It is more than ironic that all this hardware is landing in local police stations all across the country even as we learn that ISIS is fighting its jihad with massive amounts of American military equipment seized from the ineffective Iraqi puppet government. Que bono? Who profits?

And if you are concerned that Ferguson swept Gaza out of the news, please note that in the context of the myth of American innocence, everything is related. Isn’t the sacrifice of 500 children in Gaza related to the execution of the unarmed in Ferguson? And the connection is not merely symbolic; it is quite literal: at least two of the four law enforcement agenciesthat were deployed in Ferguson received training from Israeli security forces recently. Indeed, according to the Electronic Intifada (

Under the cover of counterterrorism training, nearly every major police agency in the United States has traveled to Israel for lessons in occupation enforcement, a phenomenon that journalist Max Blumenthal dubbed “theIsraelification of America’s security apparatus.” Israeli forces and US police departments are so entrenched that the New York City Police Department (NYPD) has opened a branch in Tel Aviv.

That is the same NYPD that has continued to racially profile young black and Latino men at the same rates under its new, progressive mayor as it did under its previous, conservative mayor.

Even though we bi-coastal progressives are horrified (our innocence punctured once again) when we hear of each new outrage, countless others find themselves unified in their denial. To deny something is to declare it taboo. And “taboo” (“kapu” in Hawaiian) means “too sacred to mention.” The sacred is a secret, and this is the secret: Americans are unified in their fear of the evil Other, and they (at least enough voting-age white Americans) will regularly declare their allegiance to a culture whose primary religious ritual is the sacrifice of this Other. He is sacred because for a while he takes our sins away. So far, for white people, the sacrifice – which, ironically, made Michael Brown sacred – has been successful.

We Shall Overcome, sang Martin Luther King, adding that “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.” May it be so. May it happen through nonviolence. May America live up to its ideals.

But I think that well-meaning people should admit that things are going to get worse before they get better. As Black militant Ramona Johnson Africa has said, Down with this rotten-ass system!

Views: 46


You need to be a member of Depth Psychology Alliance to add comments!

Join Depth Psychology Alliance

Comment by Holly Esch on September 12, 2014 at 12:02pm
Comment by Holly Esch on September 11, 2014 at 12:54pm
Check out the documentary "Gideon's Army." Race isn't mentioned explicitly, but it's an unspoken variable throughout:

"The title of Dawn Porter’s stirring documentary, “Gideon’s Army,” refers to the legion of idealistic public defenders fighting for equal justice in a land where not everybody can afford a high-priced defense attorney. That army is named after Clarence Earl Gideon, who was arrested in 1961 for stealing soda and a few dollars from a pool hall in Panama City, Fla."

A hub for "all things Depth Psychology," with over 5000 members, Depth Psychology Alliance is FREE to join. Simply sign UP or sign IN to comment or post.





Subscribe to the "Latest Activity" RSS 

feed for Depth Psychology Alliance


© 2019   Created by James Newell.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service